The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors.
Abstract Details
. A National Survey of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Practices Following Liver Transplantation
Transplant Direct. 2020 Dec 8;7(1):e638. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001086.eCollection 2021 Jan
Avin Aggarwal1, Helen S Te2, Elizabeth C Verna3, Archita P Desai4
Author information
1Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Comprehensive Digestive Institute of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
2Center for Liver Diseases, Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
3Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University, New York, NY.
4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Abstract
Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an important predictor of survival after liver transplantation (LT). Recent studies show that early diagnosis, aggressive treatment, and surveillance may improve outcomes after HCC recurrence. We sought to determine the current practices and policies regarding surveillance for HCC recurrence after LT.
Methods: We conducted a web-based national survey of adult liver transplant centers in the United States to capture center-specific details of HCC surveillance post-LT. Responses were analyzed to generate numerical and graphical summaries.
Results: Of 101 eligible adult liver transplant centers, 48 (48%) centers across the United States responded to the survey. Among the participating centers, 79% stratified transplant recipients for HCC recurrence risk, while 19% did not have any risk stratification protocol. Explant microvascular invasion (mVI) was the most common factor used in risk stratification. Use of pretransplant serum biomarkers such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was variable, with only 48% of the participating centers reporting specific "cutoff" values. While a majority of centers (88%) reported having a routine imaging protocol for HCC recurrence surveillance, there was considerable heterogeneity in terms of frequency and duration of such surveillance. Of the centers that did risk stratify patients to identify those at higher risk of HCC recurrence, about 50% did not change their surveillance protocol.
Conclusions: Our study affirms significant variability in center practices, and our results reflect the need for high-quality studies to guide risk stratification and surveillance for HCC recurrence.