Author information
1
Hepatology Department, AP-HP, University Paris Diderot; INSERM UMR1149; Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
2
Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
3
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
4
Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
5
Scripps Clinic and Scripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
6
Merck& Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
7
Department of Hepatology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS:
The aim of this integrated analysis was to assess the efficacy of the once-daily combination of elbasvir (EBR) 50 mg and grazoprevir (GZR) 100 mg, with and without ribavirin (RBV) in HCV genotype 4 (GT4)-infected participants enrolled in the Phase 2/3 clinical program with EBR/GZR.
METHODS:
Treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced participants 18 years of age or older with chronic HCV GT4 infection and baseline HCV RNA ≥10,000 IU/mL were included in the analysis. The analysis population was the full analysis set (FAS; all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication) and a total of 155 HCV GT4 participants were evaluated. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12; HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation at 12 weeks after completion of study therapy).
RESULTS:
Overall, among GT4-infected participants treated with 12 or 16 weeks of EBR/GZR ± RBV, the SVR12 efficacy rates were 96.4% (107/111) in treatment-naïve participants and 88.6% (39/44) in treatment-experienced participants. The SVR12 rates were 96.0% (97/101) in treatment-naïve participants treated with 12 weeks of EBR/GZR, and 100% (8/8) in treatment-experienced participants treated with 16 weeks of EBR/GZR plus RBV. Efficacy was not impacted by GT4 subtype.
CONCLUSIONS:
The regimens of 12 weeks of EBR/GZR without RBV, and 16 weeks of EBR/GZR plus RBV, were efficacious in HCV GT4-infected treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced participants, respectively. Baseline NS5A resistance-associated substitutions did not impact the efficacy of EBR/GZR in GT4-infected participants.