The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors.
Abstract Details
Is it time for chronopharmacology in NASH?
J Hepatol. 2022 Jan 20;S0168-8278(22)00010-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.039.Online ahead of print.
Thomas Marjot1, David W Ray2, Jeremy W Tomlinson3
Author information
Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Liver Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: Thomas.marjot@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: Jeremy.tomlinson@ocdem.ox.ac.uk.
Abstract
Liver homeostasis is strongly influenced by the circadian clock, an evolutionarily conserved mechanism synchronizing physiology and behaviour across a 24-hour cycle. Disruption of the clock has been heavily implicated in the pathogenesis of metabolic dysfunction including non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Furthermore, many of the current NASH drug candidates specifically target pathways known to be under circadian control including fatty acid synthesis and signalling via farnesoid X receptor (FXR), fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 19 and 21, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and γ, glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and thyroid hormone receptor. Despite this, there has been little consideration of the application of chronopharmacology in NASH, a strategy whereby the timing of drug delivery is informed by biological rhythms in order to maximize efficacy and tolerability. Chronopharmacology has been shown to have significant clinical benefits in a variety of settings including cardiovascular disease and cancer therapy. The rationale for embedding clock-logic within the treatment of NASH is therefore compelling but is currently underutilized. Indeed, no clinical trials in NASH have specifically explored the impact of drug timing on disease progression and patient outcomes. This may contribute to the wide variability in reported outcomes of NASH trials and partly explain why even late-phase trials have stalled because of lack of efficacy or safety concerns. In this opinion piece, we describe the potential for chronopharmacology in NASH, discuss how the major NASH drug candidates are influenced by circadian biology, and encourage greater consideration of the timing of drug administration in the design of future clinical trials.